¿Cómo nos afectan los aranceles contra el aluminio y el acero ante una Guerra Comercial Global?

Image result for aluminum steel cartoon

El 8 de marzo de 2018, el presidente Donald Trump ordenó la imposición de aranceles del 25% sobre las importaciones de acero y aranceles del 10% sobre las importaciones de aluminio. Ests aranceles cubren una amplia gama de productos de acero y aluminio y se aplican por igual a las importaciones de la mayoría de los países.

La orden eximió inicialmente las importaciones de Canadá y México. Sin embargo, hoy 31 de mayo, Estados Unidos dijo que estaba avanzando con los aranceles sobre las importaciones de aluminio y acero de Canadá, México y la Unión Europea, poniendo fin a una exención de dos meses y preparando el escenario para una guerra comercial con sus aliados.

Los aranceles impuestos por Trump se aplican a productos de acero que se definen en el Sistema Armonizado de Aranceles con los siguientes 6 dígitos:

  • 720610 a 721650,
  • 721699 a 730110,
  • 730210,
  • 730240 a 730290 y
  • 730410 hasta 730690

Mientras que, se aplicarán aranceles para los productos de aluminio en el nivel de 4 dígitos de la Lista armonizada , como se enumera en la tabla a continuación. Además, se incluyen dos códigos HS en el nivel de 10 dígitos, que cubre fundiciones y forjados de aluminio. El alcance de los aranceles para los productos de aluminio no incluye la bauxita o la alúmina, que son materias primas para la producción de aluminio primario (sin elaborar). También se excluyen los desperdicios y desechos de aluminio (HS 7602) y los polvos y escamas de aluminio (HS 7603), ya que representan diferentes sectores industriales.

Código Arancelario

Descripción

7601

Aluminio en bruto

7604

Barras, varillas y perfiles de aluminio

7605

Alambre de aluminio

7606

Placas, láminas y tiras de aluminio de un espesor superior a 0,2 mm *

7607

Papel de aluminio (incluso impreso o respaldado con papel, cartón, plástico o soportes similares) de un grosor (sin incluir el soporte) inferior o igual a 0,2 mm

7608

Tubos y tubos de aluminio

7609

Tubos de aluminio y accesorios de tubería

7616.99.51.60

Otros artículos de aluminio: fundición

7616.99.51.70

Otros artículos de aluminio: forjados

Los efectos de esta guerra comercial-arancelaria aún no son claros para Guatemala, Centroamérica y el resto del mundo.  Sin embargo, tenemos la certeza de que el efecto inmediato de una potencial guerra comercial global hará que los inversionistas disminuyan sus inversiones en el corto plazo. Esto debilitará la recuperación económica que se había venido teniendo durante los últimos años.  Los funcionarios europeos argumentan que los aranceles dañarán el crecimiento en ambos lados del Atlántico y disminuirá el poder de compra de todos en general.

Brasil, Argentina y Australia acordaron, disminuir sus envíos de acero a Estados Unidos a cambio de que no se les aplicasen los aranceles, indicó el Departamento de Comercio de Estados Unidos y los aranceles se mantendrán en las importaciones desde Japón.

Los efectos de una Guerra Comercial

Como elocuentemente explicó el economista ganador del Premio Nobel Christopher Pissarides, una guerra comercial de ojo por ojo podría ” perjudicar” a la base de la industria manufacturera y los trabajadores agrícolas de Estados Unidos, ya que dependen de la inversión extranjera y comercian con países como China y Japón.

En última instancia, cualquier tipo de proteccionismo socava las bases de una inmensa red de acuerdos comerciales, que sostienen el comercio pacífico entre las naciones de todo el mundo. Lo que está en juego no es menos que un período sin precedentes de paz y prosperidad en la historia humana que afectará las expectativas de crecimiento económico a mediano y largo plazo.

Nos esperan meses de mucha turbulencia económica en la industria manufacturera.  Mantengamos los ojos abiertos.

Advertisements

Temas de política mundial en el 2018

Los motores comienzan a calentarse y el mundo está lleno de expectativas respecto al 2018. Este año será un “año nervioso” como explicaron con cierta preocupación en uno de los más recientes números en la revista The Economist. Y esto es desde ya cierto para nuestra región; en Centroamérica no salimos de un conflicto y ya nos estamos metiendo en otro más de los ya usuales temblores económicos y políticos que afectan las esperanzas de crecimiento sostenible de la economía.

Economía global:

Para aquellos de nosotros en los negocios, la economía mundial continuará moviéndose a un ritmo moderado. Solo deberíamos preocuparnos de que los banqueros centrales de las economías desarrolladas no continúen jugando con las tasas de interés. Además, hay que leer con atención las decisiones que tome el gobierno británico respecto al acuerdo comercial que establecerá con la Unión Europea luego de su salida (las recientes votaciones fueron un revés para el gobierno conservador y esto es una amenaza para la estabilidad económica y comercial).

Medio Oriente:

El próximo año será particularmente difícil en Medio Oriente debido a la derrota territorial del Estado Islámico. El impacto de esta derrota se verá con más ataques y des-estabilización en Siria, Iraq y Turquía que rápidamente pueden convertirse en líos globales. A esto, debemos sumar la amenaza presentada por el gobierno de Donald Trump y sus pequeños aliados al reconocer la ciudad de Jerusalén como la capital de Israel en un conflicto que tiene más de 50 años de estarse desarrollando.

Corea del Norte – USA:

Asia y el mundo entero se unirán en contra de la proliferación nuclear y deberemos de seguir con mucha atención el abismo de aislamiento económico y político en el que se está sumiendo Corea del Norte; las recientes plásticas entre Corea del Norte y Corea del Sur pueden ser solamente una excusa de Pyongyang por retrasar un ataque directo de Estados Unidos.

 

 

Elecciones en Latino América:

Para nuestra región, las principales noticias serán de las elecciones en el año 2018. Brasil y México, las dos economías más grandes de la región tendrán dos controvertidas elecciones y los votantes habrán de decidir entre uno de los peores males en cada candidatura.

Las elecciones en Brasil y México serán decisivas en cuanto al crecimiento o no de América Latina. En Brasil, el gobierno tiene como prioridad estabilizar el aumento de la relación deuda pública versus PIB. La baja en la inflación y las tasas de interés están facilitando una recuperación económica gradual liderada por el aumento del consumo. El resultado de las elecciones presidenciales de octubre de 2018 es incierto. En México, continuará la incertidumbre sobre la revisión del TLC con Estados Unidos y el resultado de las elecciones presidenciales de julio de 2018 ya se hace escuchar. Andrés Manuel López Obrador, del partido de centro-izquierda, sigue siendo el favorito para la presidencia, pero la carrera la decidirá contra Jose Antonio Meade Kuribreña del PRI. Ante esta situación, el crecimiento del PIB promediará 2.1% para México en los períodos 2018-22 según el Banco Mundial.

Centroamérica:

Para Centroamérica, el pesimismo está a la vuelta de la esquina, y la ilegalidad del gobierno hondureño al reelegirse seguirá siendo una controversia durante el primer semestre del 2018.  La decisión de los líderes de nuestros país vecino durante las primeras semanas de enero y febrero serán muy importante para determinar el pronóstico económico del país y también el nuestro.  Recordemos que más del 40% de las exportaciones guatemaltecas se envían a importadores del Mercado Común Centroamericano (El Salvador, Honduras, Nicaragua, Costa Rica) y cualquier problema político de larga escala en ese país nos impactará seriamente.  Es importante recalcar que, en los últimos años, Honduras tuvo el mejor pronóstico económico de crecimiento en la región para los próximos años y el caos creado por la reelección inconstitucional de Hernández puede poner las cosas patas arriba.

Guatemala:

Por último, nos queda Guatemala. El año 2018 será un año clave para la continuidad de las investigaciones de la CICIG y el Ministerio Público. Al momento, se han anunciado que nuevos casos serán presentados a principios del 2018. La lucha entre el Pacto de Corruptos y nosotros, la gente honesta, seguirá siendo una batalla dura y larga. Con la reciente elección de la Junta Directiva del Congreso de Guatemala el Pacto de Corruptos se ha fortalecido. El publico deberá seguir con mucha atención la elección de:

  • Consulta Popular del diferendo territorial, insular y marítimo con Belice: 15 de abril.
  • Fiscal General: 17 de mayo.
  • Contralor General: 13 de octubre.
  • Corte Suprema de Justicia: 13 de octubre.

Piketty’s “Capital,” and the Rest of the World

Video: Thomas Piketty Discusses, “Capital In The 21st Century” with Ryan Grim and Alexis Goldstein

The book by the French economist Thomas Piketty’s Capital in the Twenty-First Century has already become part of everyday discussions and is being referenced among academics. The research by Piketty has come in the perfect time and there are plenty of reasons why. Piketty’s book discussion brings some light to the study of income quintiles and deciles into a new debate of the “the skyrocketing incomes of the 1% — and the mind-boggling gains of the 0.1% and 0.01%  — by gathering and publishing income tax data that nobody had bothered with before. Piketty was behind similar projects in France, Britain, Japan, and other countries.” (via Justin Fox at the Harvard Business Review)

I finished reading the book this weekend and it was eye-opening. The book presents great challenges to the study of capital and inequalities in the developed economies as well as in the rest of the world. The book also opens the doors for a wider discussion on the effects European Capital has had in the global economy. Further, the book invites globalists to challenge our understanding of European-centric terms that over longer periods of time become, perhaps, insufficient to comprehend global economic processes over the passing of centuries and how these processes have changed and transformed themselves by a complex evolution and redefinition.

It can’t be denied that capital during all of the 19th Century and in the beginning of the 20th Century was centered in the main European metropolises and extracted most of the goods from the periphery. Few Capital remained in colonies and protectorates. Wealth belonged to the Empires and Poverty remained in colonial territories. Even the poorest of the European was considered Rich by comparison to the inhabitants of Colonies.

Today, European Empires are gone for a while, U.S. Capital increased and gained from the fall of the European Empires and new economies started developing in former Colonies. Giant Economies like China and Russia woke up after decades of isolation from global trade and today reconfigured our understanding of Capital. Piketty’s book somehow fails to explore this Global political changes and its economic effects.

Piketty’s central argument has a gigantic weakness since it is tied to nation-states and cannot be compared or understood in reference to Global Capital flows in today’s multinational economy. Very few references are made to the role played by Multinational Companies and foreign national investments and savings by State Companies in the world.  And less is mentioned of global inequalities and the North-South divide that has been increased by the investments done by Developed and Developing Economies in the rest of the world.  Piketty argues that Capital has tended over time to grow faster than the overall economy (he focuses on European and US economies); and that income from capital is invariably much less evenly distributed than labor income (again he focuses on European and US economies). Thus failing to acknowledge how Labor income stopped been localized during the 20th Century and it involved multiple polities far away from the metropolis.  Piketty argues that together (Capital growth and its uneven distribution) amount to a powerful force for increasing inequality.

Piketty doesn’t take things as far as Marx and this is a pitty. Marx’s methodology involved the State but it also referenced to its effects both and from the peripheries through the pass of longer periods of time. This is one of the most important contributions of Marx: his global understand of the economy.

Piketty shows how over the two-plus centuries for which good records exist, the only major decline in capital’s economic share and in economic inequality was the result of World Wars I and II, which destroyed lots of capital and brought much higher taxes in the U.S. and Europe. However, he again fails to acknowledge how Capital grew in the Global South after these wars as a result of increased inequalities in the Colonies and Agriculture-centered States in South America and Asia. During the wars Capital destruction was followed by a spectacular run of economic growth that involved the entire globe and not only Europe and the U.S.  The Cold War is a good reference for finding how Capital flows went from Europe to Asia, America and Africa.  As well, the run of economic growth started involving non-State actors in which Capital continue increasing at a higher and faster rate than the one he references and studies. Failing to study this shows in Piketty’s book that after decades of peace, slowing growth, and declining tax rates, capital and inequality are on the rise all over the developed world only, and it’s not clear what if anything will alter that trajectory in the decades to come.  However, the declining tax rates, capital and inequality are on the rise at a faster pace in the developing economies and in the “puppet states” (Nigeria, Chile, the Middle East countries) which have emerged around them as sources of petrol, minerals and rare earths.

Piketty’s main worry as points out Justin Fox is that “growing wealth in Europe will bring a return to 19th century circumstances in which most affluent people get that way through inheritance.” Plus, “U.S. median income will continue lossing ground relative to other nations in the following years”. But this are not the only worries that we should identify.  The BRICS countries are probably a good source of comparison to see how the growing wealth of the 20th Century remains on the hands of the few rich and is currently been passed through inheritance. Further, developing economies in South America and Africa are an extreme case of the last.

Piketty’s solution to Europe’s and U.S. problems is that a progressive global wealth tax be established. But this tax will fail to be the best response to the current dynamics of inequality if Capital continues flowing outside of Europe into multinational capital investments overseas and into State companies overseas. 

I enjoyed this political economy analysis and will continue learning a lot from it. Piketty’s solution is a challenge for the study of global political economy and the reconfiguration of the global economy in the 21st Century. Perhaps if a new book is published studying the shareholders who own the most stock in almost every Fortune 500 company and the Capital of any major global company instead of only the economies of France, Germany or the United States more accurate insights will be found.

 

The legacy of George Washington’s Postal Service Act of February 20, 1792

127304 600 End of Saturday Mail Delivery cartoons

WASHINGTON — Faced with billions of dollars in losses, the Postal Service announced on Wednesday (Feb. 06 2013) that it would seek to stop Saturday delivery of letters, a sweeping change in mail delivery that immediately drew criticism from postal unions, some businesses and lawmakers.

What went wrong I wonder?  Would it had been better if George Washington had never passed the Postal Service Act of 1792? How many billions would taxpayers have saved since then?  Would private companies like the  American Letter Mail Company of Lysander Spooner have served better the market? Or would the system have collapsed without government intervention?

In February 20, 1792 the Postal Service Act, establishing the United States Post Office Department was signed by President George Washington.  An interesting date to remember in these days in which the Postal Service made it to the news with their Losses and their controversial solution by ending Saturday Letter Delivery.

We know for certain that in a free market no company would survive if they had kept losses as huge as the one USPS has had over all these years. They had losses of   $15.9 billion only last year.  A principle of free market transactions is that in competing  there appears a beneficial rivalry among sellers trying to achieve goals as increasing profits, market share, and sales volume by varying the elements of the marketing mix: price, product, distribution, and promotion.  Thus, enabling for those companies which succeed in growing larger and for those companies which fail to disappear.  With the existence of monopolistic services (like the Postal Service in the US) industries and business sponsored by government disrupted market transactions (bureaucratically made) and thus enabled for failing companies to continue existing even though they were not beneficial for society in the long-term.

126863 600 going postal cartoons

This reminds me to the company founded Lysander Spooner whom “being an advocate of self-employment and opponent of government regulation of business, Spooner started his own business called American Letter Mail Company which competed with the U.S. Post Office. Postal rates were notoriously high in the 1840s,[7] and in 1844, Spooner founded the American Letter Mail Company, which had offices in various cities, including Baltimore, Philadelphia, and New York.[8] Stamps could be purchased and then attached to letters which could be sent to any of its offices. From here agents were dispatched who traveled on railroads and steamboats, and carried the letters in hand bags. Letters were transferred to messengers in the cities along the routes who then delivered the letters to the addressees. This was a challenge to the United States Post Office’s monopoly.[7][9] As he had done when challenging the rules of the Massachusetts bar, he published a pamphlet titled “The Unconstitutionality of the Laws of Congress Prohibiting Private Mails.” Although Spooner had finally found commercial success with his mail company, legal challenges by the government eventually exhausted his financial resources. He closed up shop without ever having had the opportunity to fully litigate his constitutional claims. The lasting legacy of Spooner’s challenge to the postal service was the 3-cent stamp, adopted in response to the competition his company provided.[10]

Lets have this as food for thought…

A Satellite’s View of Ship Pollution and globalization

Cargo-Ship650The geographical hotspots of the world are all related to economic trade and global exchange of political interests. Places such as the Panama and Suez Canals have always been in the Western media. However, from an economic and strategic perspective, the Strait of Malacca is one of the most important shipping lanes in the world in the 21st Century. The history of this Strait’s geopolitical relevance goes as back as 400 years of history.

For centuries the strait has been the main shipping channel between the Indian Ocean and the Pacific Ocean. It has been controlled by the major regional powers and also by the mayor global power during different historical periods. In 2011 hundreds of thousands of containers in more than 60,000 vessels crossed its waters carrying about one-quarter of the world’s traded goods including oil, Chinese manufactures, and Indonesian coffee.

In order to understand which is the geopolitical importance of the Strait of Malacca for the Chinese government we need to overview the current geopolitical dynamics and economic investments in the region.

The following image from NASA clearly depicts what are some of the IMPRESSIVE negative externalities caused by the transport of global goods in the region and opens the door for discussing

  • How can we fix this?
  • Who should fix it?
  • Can it be fixed?
  • Can we reduce the future impacts in the area?
  • What solutions are available?
A Satellite’s View of Ship Pollution

Color bar for A Satellite’s View of Ship Pollution
acquired 2005 – 2012 download large image (2 MB, JPEG, 1800×1800)

Elevated levels of nitrogen dioxide pop out over certain shipping lanes in observations made by the Aura satellite between 2005-2012. The signal was the strongest over the northeastern Indian Ocean.

Data from the Dutch and Finnish-built Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) on NASA’s Aura satellite show long tracks of elevated nitrogen dioxide (NO2) levels along certain shipping routes. NO2, is among a group of highly-reactive oxides of nitrogen, known as NOx, that can lead to the production of fine particles and ozone that damage the human cardiovascular and respiratory systems. Combustion engines, such as those that propel ships and motor vehicles, are a major source of NO2 pollution.

To learn some more on the importance of the Strait of Malacca and the value of this shipping lane you can read the essay I wrote titled “The Strait of Malacca as one of the most important geopolitical regions for the People’s Republic of China. Download (.pdf)

U.S. Gun Murders in 2010: an Alternative View

us_gun_murders.jpgHow many gun murder victims in the U.S. are black? How many were killed with hand guns (and not with the now fiercely debated assault rifles)? U.S. Gun Murders in 2010 [periscopic.com] by Periscopic combines function and beauty to examine the data retrieved from the U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation‘s Uniform Crime Report. Its main goal consist of encouraging people to consider individual lives instead of just the statistic

Each arc represents a unique person, where the yellow color denotes how long they lived before being shot, and the white color how long they could have lived. Each arc is clickable and reveals more detailed information about that casualty.

A relatively hidden button at X-axis origin shows a cumulative graph of this data, revealing the relative peaks of age of the victims of gun crimes. Additionally, at the bottom of the page, a small collection of insights is provided.

Via: information aesthetics

Satellite images of negative externalities caused by Globalization

I always keep track of the images from space taken by NASA.  They usually have impressive “natural hazards” photographed with the highest technology available.  However, sometimes the natural hazards to humanity are not caused by the natural cycles of Earth.  In those cases, it is humans who have created hazards for themselves and people die.  Now, why would we create things that harm us so much? Why would we support and contribute to such terrible things?  A good explanation is the one given by economists with the complex and difficult term negative externalities.

A negative externality is a spillover of an economic transaction that negatively impacts a party that is not directly involved in the transaction. The first party bears no costs for their impact on society while the second party receives no benefits from being impacted. This occurs when marginal social cost is greater than marginal private cost (MSC > MPC).

The case of pollution in China elucidates very well how the market-driven approach to correcting externalities by “internalizing” third party costs and benefits fails to work in a globalized economy.  For example, by requiring a polluter to repair any damage caused. But, in many cases internalizing costs or benefits is not feasible, especially if the true monetary values cannot be determined.  In fact, our technological gadgets and thousands of products imported from China are the cause of the hazardous health conditions in that country.  We as consumers are part of this chain by buying the products. How can we do something?

I would suggest that the best way to participate in a positive way is to continue creating awareness of the failure of the government of China to protect the lives of the Chinese people.  It is at the end of the day the responsibility of that government to protect the life and property of its citizens, not ours.  We as consumers can only morally sanction them and stop consuming their products whenever possible.

This is a good (and very unfortunate) example of how globalization without an objective code of values becomes a zero sum game.  I share with you the information regarding how dangerous has become the air in the surroundings of Beijing and Tianjin,

—-

Air Quality Suffering in China

acquired January 14, 2013download large image (7 MB, JPEG, 5000×6400)
acquired January 14, 2013download GeoTIFF file (47 MB, TIFF)
Air Quality Suffering in China

acquired January 3, 2013download large image (8 MB, JPEG, 5000×6400)
acquired January 3, 2013download GeoTIFF file (51 MB, TIFF)
acquired January 3 – 14, 2013download Google Earth file (KMZ)

Residents of Beijing and many other cities in China were warned to stay inside in mid-January 2013 as the nation faced one of the worst periods of air quality in recent history. The Chinese government ordered factories to scale back emissions, while hospitals saw spikes of more than 20 to 30 percent in patients complaining of respiratory issues, according to news reports.

The Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) on NASA’s Terra satellite acquired these natural-color images of northeastern China on January 14 (top) and January 3, 2013. The top image shows extensive haze, low clouds, and fog over the region. The brightest areas tend to be clouds or fog, which have a tinge of gray or yellow from the air pollution. Other cloud-free areas have a pall of gray and brown smog that mostly blots out the cities below. In areas where the ground is visible, some of the landscape is covered with lingering snow from storms in recent weeks. (Snow is more prominent in the January 3 image.)

At the time that the January 14 image was taken by satellite, ground-based sensors at the U.S. Embassy in Beijingreported PM2.5 measurements of 291 micrograms per cubic meter of air. Fine, airborne particulate matter (PM) that is smaller than 2.5 microns (about one thirtieth the width of a human hair) is considered dangerous because it is small enough to enter the passages of the human lungs. Most PM2.5 aerosol particles come from the burning of fossil fuels and biomass (wood fires and agricultural burning). The World Health Organization considers PM2.5to be safe when it is below 25.

Also at the time of the image, the air quality index (AQI) in Beijing was 341. An AQI above 300 is considered hazardous to all humans, not just those with heart or lung ailments. AQI below 50 is considered good. On January 12, the peak of the current air crisis, AQI was 775 the U.S Embassy Beijing Air Quality Monitor—off the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency scale—and PM2.5 was 886 micrograms per cubic meter.

  1. Resources

  2. Air Pollution in China: Real-time Air Quality Index Visual Map. Accessed January 14, 2013.
  3. China Air Daily. Accessed January 14, 2013.
  4. U.S Embassy Beijing Air Quality Monitor. Accessed January 14, 2013.
  1. References

  2. Associated Press, via Yahoo News (2013, January 14) Beijing warns residents after off-the-charts smog . Accessed January 14, 2013.
  3. NASA (2010, September 22) New Map Offers a Global View of Health-Sapping Air Pollution.Accessed January 14, 2013.
  4. NASA Earth Observatory (2012, March 23) Satellites Map Fine Aerosol Pollution Over China.
  5. The New York Times (2013, January 14) China allows media to report alarming air pollution crisis. Accessed January 14, 2013.
  6. Yahoo News (2013, January 14) China’s air pollution problem slideshow. Accessed January 14, 2013.

NASA image courtesy Jeff Schmaltz, LANCE MODIS Rapid Response. Caption by Mike Carlowicz.